Skip to content
Menu ▾
Begin with the problem Search

Use Regulayer

For attorneys The Regulayer Receipt HumanMark The free Sealer See the product Pricing How to buy

License Regulayer

Enterprise What is licensed Agentic AI Life sciences Insurance Deployment Begin with the problem

Proof

Live demos Verify free

Learn

The Consequence Library Learning Center The Drift Desk Detectors compared Authorship marks compared

Company

About Investors Why now FAQ Support Legal
Patent pending
The engine What is licensed Deployment Assurance Drift Control Life sciences Begin with the problem

The capability, defined

Production evidence and review. Two acts, not one.

Was this made by a person, and did a person check it? Two different questions, two different records. Language that names only one gives away the other half, and most of the market is selling one half or the other.

The two acts

Production: how did the input enter the work?

Recorded by HumanMark, which places the observations into one of five descriptive production bands, recorded as the work is made, on the device where it is made. Never a probability, never a percentage. It does not determine or claim authorship.

Review: did a person check it, and which parts?

Answered by the receipt: a signed, dated record of what a named individual verified, sealed at the moment of the decision, checkable by anyone afterwards.

A production record with no review is a publishing credential. A review log with no production record is a signature on an unexamined origin. Regulated work increasingly requires both: the EU AI Act's human oversight duties turn on a person, its transparency exemption for published content turns on review with named editorial responsibility, and every standing order in the legal market asks some version of both questions at once.

Why detectors answer neither

A detector reads finished work and returns a probability that it was machine-written. It was not present at creation, so it estimates. It says nothing about review, because review is an act, not a texture. And in Stanford research its false-positive rate on non-native English writers reached 61.2 per cent, which is why the published record treats the score as a screening signal rather than evidence of authorship.

The alternative is capture, not detection: record the creation facts as the work is made, and record the review as it happens. Both records signed, both checkable by anyone holding them, both stating their assurance level on their face.

Where it is built

Production evidence and review run through the whole estate: HumanMark and Presence for the first act, The Witness for the second, and the engine underneath both. The attorney product, the Regulayer Receipt, is the same capability packaged for a court-facing duty.

Licensing begins with the problem, not the product.

Describe the system, what it decides, and what it would cost you to be unable to prove it. A written scope follows before any call.

Ways to begin:

A scoped pilot, inside your estate, on your machines. An architecture briefing, for your security function, one hour. The diligence pack: the record format and the estate, in writing. The problem itself, in your own words.

hello@regulayer.com