Investors
Who authorized this action, and can an outsider check it?
Regulayer checks current human authority before consequential AI acts, then leaves an independently verifiable record.
Why this matters now
External institutions now ask for human oversight, accountability and evidence.
This is not a speculative market. The demand is written down, with dates.
The autonomy defence is gone
California Civil Code §1714.46 removed the defence that the AI acted autonomously. Europe’s high-risk duties, including human oversight by natural persons and event logging, apply from 2 December 2027.
Oversight is a condition of cover
Insurance is beginning to condition AI-agent coverage on independently tested controls. In February 2026, ElevenLabs announced an AIUC-1-backed insurance policy covering AI voice agents after certification involving more than 5,000 adversarial tests across security, safety, reliability, privacy and accountability.
The record cannot be back-filled
Courts sanction unverified AI work and ask what a person actually checked. The record has to exist at the moment of the action. It cannot be added later.
The dated public record behind these developments is maintained openly in the Consequential AI Evidence Monitor.
Built, not theoretical
Shipping software, and a record anyone can check without us.
- Deterministic pre-action check. The action is evaluated against current human authority before it proceeds, and fails closed.
- Sealed artifact. A signed record, sealed on the device at the moment of the decision.
- Public verifier. Anyone holding the record can verify it in a browser, with no account and no call to us.
- Offline operation. Enforcement and evidence signing require no network egress.
Run the live demonstrations → The demo leaves you an artifact you keep and can check without us.
Why Regulayer is different
No equivalent shipping combination located.
Adjacent tools each hold a piece: a policy engine names a rule, an expiry names a clock, a signed log proves nothing was altered. The combination below is what answers the question, and it ships as one product.
Held outside the model as a dated, revocable decision.
The check runs before the action. No match, no action.
The record names the exact decision that was in force at that moment.
Checkable by an outsider, offline, without trusting the vendor.
Why it is defensible
Structure, custody and a filed estate.
Filed patent estate
A filed estate across the architecture, covering the engine, the record, the offline case and the authority check itself. Patent pending.
On-device custody
The signing key never leaves the governed device. A vendor whose proof story is “we sign, you verify” cannot adopt that custody without giving up the position it sells.
Enterprise evaluation completed
The product completed an enterprise evaluation at an Am Law 100 firm, including review by Procurement and Information Security, with the Chief Information Officer engaged across several meetings. The firm assessed the product as promising and innovative. Under its standing adoption policy, deployment follows a reference implementation at a peer organisation, and the firm has asked to re-engage on that basis.
Cleanroom isolation
The checking kernel shares no memory, no process and no storage with the AI it checks. Following the architecture can require changing an incumbent’s trust model, not shipping a feature.
How this becomes a business
A licensing company, with the record as the product.
It runs on the customer’s own machines, so there is no hosting and no cost of goods that rises with usage.
Enterprise licensing
The engine licensed around an organisation’s own AI systems and agents, deployed on their infrastructure.
Professional firms
Firm-wide licences where courts and regulators already ask for evidence of review.
OEM and embedded
Regulayer inside a product, platform or system another company ships to its own customers.
Insurance, two-sided
Carriers deploy AI and need the record; underwriters can require the artifact as a condition of cover, which makes the underwriting side a channel.
Self-serve, shipping now
The practitioner product sells today, self-serve. It is proof of commerce, not the ceiling of the model.
The bigger asset
Authority is the spearhead, not the whole estate.
The filed estate carries further monetizable assets beyond the authority product. Each is disclosed in filings; none is explained here beyond its name.
Founder
Louisa Johnson Bullock. Founder and Inventor.
Regulated-industry commercialization
Drove field adoption of the USP 797 sterile-compounding standard, CRISPR commercialization at Thermo Fisher Scientific, clean-environment manufacturing at DuPont, semiconductor manufacturing at Texas Instruments, contamination control at ITW.
Category adoption, driven before
The founder drove a control standard into a regulated field and into adoption from the commercial side. USP 797, written by a standards committee, governs sterile compounding today.
Interested in Regulayer?
We speak privately with individual investors and strategic partners who understand enterprise AI, security, regulated markets and infrastructure.
Investor inquiries → hello@regulayer.com
This page is company information. It is not an offer to sell securities, or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, and nothing on it should be relied on as such. Any discussion of an investment happens privately, with appropriate documentation.