Regulayer / Who requires a record
BAR RULES PROPOSED · VERIFICATION AND FIRM PROCEDURES
California Rule of Court 10.430 governs the courts, not you. There is no disclosure or certification obligation on filers, and there never has been. The pressure in California comes from the State Bar instead: proposed amendments to six Rules of Professional Conduct, out for comment in spring 2026 and not yet adopted, would require independent verification of every AI output and would require managerial lawyers to establish procedures governing AI use across the firm.
proposed Rule 5.1 would require managerial lawyers “to establish procedures governing AI use”
If those rules pass, a firm needs a demonstrable procedure rather than a policy document. Receipts are the procedure, running per matter, with a firm-level roll-up that never exposes a word of client work.
Regulayer makes the record. Software on your own machine that signs, at the moment you finish, which tool you declared, which checks you ran and who reviewed the work. Your client, your insurer or the court checks it in seconds, free, with no account and no access to a word of your file.
See it work, no signup PricingChecked 29 July 2026. Rules change: the authority itself governs, and this page is not legal advice. If you spot something out of date, tell us at hello@regulayer.com and we will correct it and say when.
When it is challenged
Opposing counsel looks at a sealed record and says: so what. What you say back →, in evidence-law terms, with the certification template.
Seven days free, then $349 a month.
A signed record of which AI you used and what you checked, sealed to the exact file you deliver, made on your own machine and checkable free by anyone you send it to.