Regulayer™ / Who requires a record
JUDGE BY JUDGE · PERSONAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED
No district-wide rule, and the requirement comes judge by judge, by individual standing order. The recent ones are verification rather than disclosure. Magistrate Judge van Keulen's order of February 2, 2026 states that AI use is not prohibited, but counsel must personally confirm the accuracy of any content generated. Your obligation depends on the judge you drew.
counsel “must at all times personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any content generated by these tools”
The receipt records the personal confirmation the order asks for, and it reads the same to every judge. Per-judge matching is on the roadmap, not shipped, we will not pretend otherwise about the document you file.
Regulayer™ makes the record. Software on your own machine that signs, at the moment you finish, which tool you declared, which checks you ran and who reviewed the work. Your client, your insurer or the court checks it in seconds, free, with no access to a word of your file.
See it work, no signupChecked 2 September 2026. Rules change: the authority itself governs, and this page is not legal advice.
When it is challenged
Opposing counsel looks at a sealed record and says: so what. What you say back →, in evidence-law terms, with the certification template.
A signed record of which AI you used and what you checked, sealed to the exact file you deliver, made on your own machine and checkable free by anyone you send it to.
