For AI that acts
Runtime AI governance with a receipt. Regulayer records what an AI did, under what boundary, as it happened. Built in, not bolted on.
Any consequential AI action can now produce a signed runtime receipt: what happened, under what boundary, and whether the record still holds.
Sealed, and checkable by anyone.
Regulayer creates the missing second object: a signed record of the operation itself. The output can travel. The record stays, and it holds up later without taking anyone's word for it.
The control point is the moment the AI acts.
The operation is evaluated against the governing boundary before the record is emitted, not reviewed on a screen after the fact. A bad action caught a week later is a postmortem. Caught in the path, it is governance.
The rest of the market detects after the fact, from the cloud. Regulayer governs before the action, on your machine, and proves it. That is a category, not a feature.
A short path from operation to evidence.
The output can be disputed. The receipt can be checked.
The first buyers are high-consequence. The category is everything: an answer, a ranking, an approval, a denial. Each one can carry a receipt.
Regulayer lets AI run where data cannot leave, where nothing can call home, and where the record must survive scrutiny. Sealed, local, and yours. See how it stays in the building.
A small, signed application your IT installs on the machines where the AI already runs, macOS and Windows, code-signed, with a bill of materials. No account, no server on our side, no change to the model you use. It sits beside the AI, evaluates each governed action against its boundary, and writes the signed receipt locally. Install it, run your network monitor, watch nothing leave. The full security posture.
The difference.
Validation is a moment. Deployment is a continuum. A model that passed its checks in January is a different system under June's load, and the record has to live where the work lives: inside the moment, not after it.
The moment, and the memory.
The receipt seals one consequential moment. The Witness keeps all of them: one sealed, content-free memory you can ask in plain English and hand over as a packet. The receipt is the moment. The Witness is the answer.
When a record is not enough
A record proves what happened. But some actions you cannot afford to let happen at all, a payment, a delete, a send that cannot be taken back. So the same layer can also stop the action before it runs, or hold an output before it is released. The brake sits outside the AI, where the AI cannot reach in and switch it off.
It is built to fail toward stop. If the system fails, stalls, or goes silent, the action does not slip through, it stops. Once stopped, it stays stopped until a person re-arms it. And the stop is not silent: it is sealed into the same signed record, so you can show exactly what was held, and when.
How it fits your stack
Regulayer runs out of process, next to the AI you already run, not inside it. No change to your model, your prompts, or your pipeline.
It is light enough to run on ordinary hardware, local, with no outbound call. One small component to install, not a platform to stand up.
Where it applies
Why the usual safety fails
Bolted-on guardrails sit outside the model and can be routed around. A guardrail that lives at the boundary is not a boundary at all.
A model that passes evaluation degrades quietly in production. Most deployed models drift from their validated behavior within months, and the certificate at launch does not certify a billion downstream inferences.
The operator drifts too. Error rates rise under fatigue, and the model cannot perceive operator state. Without continuous evidence, the system leans on a human whose judgement may no longer be reliable.
And litigation has no defense without a record. Every public AI dispute shares one missing artifact: a signed, tamper-evident record of what the system did, when, and on whose authority. Without it, the operator owns the liability outright.
Clean answers.
The runtime governance layer for AI. It sits on the path from the model's output to the action, judges each consequential output as it happens, and produces a signed, verifiable receipt as the byproduct.
Monitoring sees what already happened. Regulayer governs at the moment of output. The receipt is the act of governance itself, not a report assembled after the fact.
Filters and guardrails sit outside the model and can be talked past or switched off. Regulayer sits on the route from output to action, so the model cannot bypass it. The route is the control.
Regulayer is the whole estate, the full layer across an organization's AI. Heartbeat Attested is the lightest way in, the same proof scoped to a single AI surface. Same foundation, different scope.
No. The governing runs alongside the inference. The added time is imperceptible against the model's own response.
No. If the model tries to act outside the layer, it stops producing output. Removing it does not give you an ungoverned model, it gives you no model.
Yes. It governs the output, not the architecture that produced it. It works with any model from any vendor.
No. It runs sealed and local with the governed system, with no shared memory or storage with the model, and no outbound call. Your data never moves.
With you, never with us. Each operator keeps their own signed record inside their own infrastructure. Regulayer holds nothing, by design, so we can never be the breach surface. What is licensed is the receipt format and the verification, not your data.
It maps signed, tamper-evident evidence to the specific regulation you answer to. The full register, with penalties and timelines, is available under NDA.
Yes. It is the layer beneath the rest. It does not replace your filter, your observability, or your evaluation. It makes them auditable.
The estate is inventor-held, patent pending. Specific claim coverage is held under counsel and shared with qualified parties under non-disclosure.
By introduction. Tell us the problem and the AI behind it, and we reply with a written scope before any call.
The answer travels. The receipt proves what governed it.