Regulayer / Who requires a record
JUDGE BY JUDGE · PERSONAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED
No district-wide rule, roughly seven or eight judges require something by individual standing order, and the recent ones are verification rather than disclosure. Magistrate Judge van Keulen's order of February 2, 2026 states that AI use is not prohibited, but counsel must personally confirm the accuracy of any content generated. Your obligation depends on the judge you drew.
counsel “must at all times personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any content generated by these tools”
The receipt records the personal confirmation the order asks for, and it reads the same to every judge. Per-judge matching is on the roadmap, not shipped, we will not pretend otherwise about the document you file.
Regulayer makes the record. Software on your own machine that signs, at the moment you finish, which tool you declared, which checks you ran and who reviewed the work. Your client, your insurer or the court checks it in seconds, free, with no account and no access to a word of your file.
See it work, no signup PricingChecked 29 July 2026. Rules change: the authority itself governs, and this page is not legal advice. If you spot something out of date, tell us at hello@regulayer.com and we will correct it and say when.
When it is challenged
Opposing counsel looks at a sealed record and says: so what. What you say back →, in evidence-law terms, with the certification template.
Seven days free, then $349 a month.
A signed record of which AI you used and what you checked, sealed to the exact file you deliver, made on your own machine and checkable free by anyone you send it to.