Regulayer  /  Judge orders

Federal AI standing orders, one page per order

Magistrate Judge Susan Prose
D. Colorado

What the order requires, in plain words, from the court's own document.

What it requires

In consent cases, every Rule 12 and Rule 56 motion, motion to amend, and opposed motion, with response and reply, must contain a certification of use or non-use of generative AI. Where AI was used, the preparer certifies human review for accuracy against print reporters or traditional legal databases. Non-compliant filings are stricken.

The order's own words

“STANDING ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATION RE: USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN FILINGS”

Date

Standing order dated 21 October 2024

The source

Read the court's own document

How the attorney's receipt answers this order

The receipt form asks exactly what this order asks: which AI tools were used, in what manner, what you personally reviewed and checked, and who signs. Out comes the attorney's receipt, a sealed certification carrying your exact attestation language, with witnessed time if you choose it, verifiable free by the judge or opposing counsel in any browser. Nothing in your filing ever leaves your computer.

Or verify a real record, free →

Seven days free, then $349 a month.

A signed record of which AI you used and what you checked, sealed to the exact file you deliver, made on your own machine and checkable free by anyone you send it to.

Start the free weekOr verify a real record, free →

Every fact on this page was re-read against the court’s own document on 30 July 2026. Standing orders change; confirm against the judge's live page before filing. This page is information, not legal advice.