Regulayer™ / The 156 laws / Privacy law
GDPR · Article 22
Safeguards on automated decisions.
What the signed record shows
The proof is a signed, tamper-evident record. Anyone can check it, without an account, and nothing has to leave the building to make it. Evidence, not a promise.
Citation: Art 22(1)/(3), 13/14, 5(2), 30
In the same family
What to do about it
A signed record of which AI you used and what you checked, sealed to the exact file you deliver, made on your own machine and checkable free by anyone you send it to.
Part of the Regulayer™ proof catalogue: 156 laws and standards, one sealed engine. This page is a product description, not legal advice.
What the statute requires, section by section
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). Provisions addressed by this mapper, mapped from the per-decision signed record:
- Article 22(1)
- Right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing producing legal/similarly significant effects (the automated decision and the system producing it are identified).
- Article 22(3)
- Suitable safeguards, including the right to obtain human intervention, to express a view, and to contest the decision (the safeguard control state in force at the decision).
- Article 13(2)(f) / 14(2)(g)
- Information to the data subject about the existence of automated decision-making and meaningful information about the logic involved (a per-decision processing reference).
- Article 5(2)
- Accountability (the controller can demonstrate compliance; an accountability record reference per decision).
- Article 30
- Records of processing activities (a processing record reference).
Taken from the Regulayer™ entry for this instrument, which is built against the primary text.
This is the duty on the business. For what a lawyer in Europe must disclose about using AI in a filing, see Europe: the EU AI Act, the CCBE guides, and what Germany tells its lawyers.